Profil von »LouannMcDo«

Lieber Besucher, herzlich willkommen bei: PKV Foren für alle Private Krankenversicherung. Falls dies Ihr erster Besuch auf dieser Seite ist, lesen Sie sich bitte die Hilfe durch. Dort wird Ihnen die Bedienung dieser Seite näher erläutert. Darüber hinaus sollten Sie sich registrieren, um alle Funktionen dieser Seite nutzen zu können. Benutzen Sie das Registrierungsformular, um sich zu registrieren oder informieren Sie sich ausführlich über den Registrierungsvorgang. Falls Sie sich bereits zu einem früheren Zeitpunkt registriert haben, können Sie sich hier anmelden.

LouannMcDo

Anfänger
- »LouannMcDo« ist weiblich
- Registrieren Sie sich jetzt!
Sie müssen sich registrieren, um eine Verbindung mit diesem Benutzer herzustellen.

Über mich

Erosion menace in the South-east and South-south is assuming a frightening dimension, and
governments at the federal, state and local levels must
rekindle their efforts to arrest the situation. Also,
community-based associations must show interest. Part of the challenge in the past was the
abuse of the Ecological Fund. Indeed, the departed Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)
treated it as a slush fund. We bet that many of the states which have communities in the throes of extinction as a result of erosion joined
in the reverie of merriment while tragedy loomed.
That must stop.

reliefweb.int The recent
effort by Igbo Improvement Union (Oganiru Ndigbo) to
sensitise the people of the South-east on the menace of erosion is a
step in the right direction. Other community-based associations
should show interest, and partner with governments to
solve the problem. The call for tree planting and strict monitoring
of erosion control projects is right. Also, the call to monitor
road construction with respect to providing water channels should be followed by communities.
Erosion has wiped out private homes, schools, churches and public buildings and climate change can only make it worse.

The government of Muhammadu Buhari after redressing the injustice of the past,
in the distribution of the Ecological Fund, must now return the funds to its original purpose.
The fund should only be used for restitution where ecological tragedy beckons or strikes.

The era of public officials shamelessly dipping their filthy fingers into the fund to
satiate greed, instead of filling gorges created by erosion should end.
Those who unlawfully took from the fund in the past should be made to
account.

The ministries of environment at the federal and state levels must work
in synergy, to stem the tide. Part of the challenge is that
instead of being proactive, the relevant agencies have been reactive.
They only act when communities are threatened or
gone under, instead of stopping the advance.

We believe that a detailed mapping of the affected areas and a study of the pattern of
movement of erosion will help stem it. Where a likely partway is
detected, some reinforcement could save lives and property.

Such studies will also warn communities likely to be affected by erosion to work to change the causes.
Where there are contributory factors, like channelling of storm water, over-cultivation of land or similar manmade causes,
the community could be counselled to stop them.
Also, where reinforcement of gorges could
save the situation, or relocation is the only solution, necessary steps could be
taken before tragedy strikes. The present instances of
sudden and severe danger confronting communities, show lack of organisation.

It is also unacceptable that with faculties of soil science and other
related disciplines in many of our universities, we are unable to develop
some sturdy weeds or other scientific breakthroughs to stem the menace of erosion. Even as federal and state agencies take measures to control erosion, universities and other research institutes should devote resources to understudy and
find scientific
ways to deal with the problem. Part of the Ecological Fund
can be used to fund universities and research institutes in that respect.

The immediate step however is to return Ecological Fund
to its constitutional purpose. It should no longer be a slush fund for party
politics. It should be strictly for ecologically challenged states,
and specifically to address ecology problems.
The notion of giving it to party faithful or as a
presidential largesse to governors who are in good standing with the president should
seize.

unhcr.org Here is my web-site ...
Yohaig