Sie sind nicht angemeldet.

  • RoslynUjp6

    Anfänger

    Sie müssen sich registrieren, um eine Verbindung mit diesem Benutzer herzustellen.

Über mich

  • economist.comDuring his recent angry exchanges with
    senators, renowned lawyer and Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Professor Itse Sagay, exposed the kind of luxury life the legislators
    live. Sagay said: "Look at the allowance they tak e, forget the amount. Why would a whole senator collect money for his wardrobe? Is he naked? Does a labourer, who is taking just 18,000 a month get it? He’s the one who needs the money for wardrobe allowance. But these opulent, rich, super-rich people are still collecting from you and I to cloth themselves; they’re collecting money from you and I to buy newspapers; they said they’re suffering hardship by working inside chambers that are fully air-conditioned with luxurious cushions, with people serving them left, right and centre, with food and drinks available."


    Long before the exchanges, the salaries and allowances of senators and members of the
    House of Representatives have continued to attract vigorous debates in the
    public sphere. Should senators and members of the House of Representatives
    continue to receive the jumbo salaries and numerous allowances that are paid to them regardless of the
    current economic situation in the country? Those who support
    the idea of cutting the salaries and allowances of legislators are as adamant and
    uncompromising as are those who oppose the idea.



    To explore issues in the debate, we must grapple with some important questions.
    What kind of job do legislators do that other people on low paying jobs cannot do?
    In the current economic environment, can legislators justify all the salaries and allowances they receive, including other financial privileges that are accorded to them?
    These questions sit at the centre of public disappointment with the performance of National Assembly members.



    The National Assembly has failed the nation at various levels.
    The members are supposed to serve as role models but their behaviour in public
    and private spheres is not something most parents would like their children to imitate.
    On numerous occasions, the lawmakers fought openly and shamelessly outside and inside the building that serves as an emblem of morality, decency,
    maturity, and wisdom.


    The moral character of some members of the
    National Assembly is troubling. It has raised serious questions not only about the criteria for
    election of lawmakers but also questions about the
    qualities of men and women who should stand up for election.


    Some of the lawmakers have taken to open dancing and clownish behaviour in public spaces,
    even when there are pressing matters that require urgent legislative attention. In light of these misdemeanours,
    should we continue to view the legislators as paradigms of
    moral uprightness and honourable men and women? What
    are the unique elements in the personalities
    of national legislators that we should aim to emulate or avoid?



    A bad track record of involvement in corrupt practices coupled with a history of infantile and unacceptable behaviour has left citizens with no choice but deep contempt for the legislators.
    Many people are offended that the fat salaries and allowances that
    National Assembly members receive are at odds with the economic deprivations that many citizens suffer.




    There is a general agreement that the salaries and allowances of legislators should reflect
    the economic realities of our time, particularly when many
    hardworking men and women are owed months of salaries in various states.
    While it could be argued that the National Assembly is not responsible for payment of salaries of workers in the states,
    we must keep in mind that the National Assembly has an obligation to show leadership, particularly in their constituencies.
    They can and should influence state governors to pay regular
    salaries to workers.


    Some of the allowances that are paid to legislators are outrageous.
    They should be removed or reduced drastically. A typical senator,
    for example, receives all manner of allowances that
    would make the poor in our society to shed tears.
    For example, a senator is reported to receive payments
    known as tour duty allowance, house maintenance, wardrobe allowance,
    newspaper allowance, personal assistant allowance, entertainment allowance, utilities allowance, vehicle
    gas maintenance allowance, domestic staff allowance, and others I cannot list here owing to
    space constraints. Some of these allowances
    are paid yearly while others are paid once every four years.

    They are in millions and thousands of naira.


    These stupendous allowances show just how we encourage and sustain social
    inequalities in our society. Consider millions of graduates who
    are unemployed and who have been roaming the streets of
    major cities in search of jobs. How would they feel when they see the astonishing salaries and allowances that are paid to senators and members of the House of Representatives?

    Are the salaries and allowances morally justified in our society?
    They cannot be justified in any way. Should the salaries and allowances be cut?

    Absolutely yes!


    unhcr.orgThere are sound reasons to advocate
    a significant cut in the salaries and allowances of National Assembly members.
    First, there has been a sharp drop in the prices of petroleum products in the international market.

    Oil, as everyone knows, is Nigeria’s main foreign exchange earner.
    The country no longer
    receives the kind of revenue it used to earn through the sale of
    petroleum products. This has been attributed to a
    plunge in oil prices.


    The second reason why the salaries and allowances of legislators have to be
    slashed is the economic recession that has gripped the nation for some time.

    Although the government hastily announced some weeks ago
    that Nigeria has survived the recession, ordinary citizens are yet to feel the impact
    of that exaggerated news. For many citizens, life is still
    tough. Prices of goods in the market are still beyond the reach of many people.



    The third reason for advocating a cut in the salaries and allowances
    of National Assembly members is the growing army of the unemployed.
    There are millions of university and polytechnic
    graduates who cannot find jobs, who are unable to receive
    bank loans to set up medium scale businesses of their own. These unemployed graduates
    need assistance in the form of jobs and business loans.
    Those who cannot see any future have joined the
    army of kidnappers, armed robbers, and high profile "419" club of swindlers who defraud
    many people of their hard earned income. The situation is dire for
    many people. National Assembly members have to come down from their high horses rather than live the life of opulence for which they have become
    notorious.


    As far back as 2015, the chairperson of the Revenue Mobilisation, Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC),
    Mr. Elias Mbam, said the commission had started to reduce the pay of
    the President, senators, members of the House of Representatives, as
    well as those pertaining to all elected public officials
    as a way to manifest current economic realities.
    Whether the commission has done this is an open question. The RMAFC is responsible for setting the remuneration of
    political office holders, including that of elected and appointed
    office holders.

    My web blog: Yohaig

Persönliche Informationen